BRAUN TIMEPIECES
AND THE GENIUS OF DIETER RAMS
Throughout the early stages of my retail therapy project a couple of comments were made about my chosen clock design. This was that it was fairly Braun-esque and I should be careful to make sure to not copy from these designs. While I was familiar with many Braun products and designs, I wasn’t quite sure what they meant, but decided to take it as a compliment none the less. They were of course referring to the Braun Travel Desk Clocks of the 1980s. Most specifically the AB1 shown on the left, released in 1987 and designed by Dietrich Lubs. This was based off the earlier design by Dieter Rams from 1984, the AB2 that is shown on the right. So I thought I’d write a little blog about Braun and these clocks.
With a legacy spanning decades it is difficult to cover all the great designs that came from Braun over the years. With such a wide range of products, I thought why not focus on timepieces. I think it’s something that people often don’t give much thought to, especially in this modern era with phones making it so easy to check the time. There was a time when Braun were at the forefront of clock design and I think this illustrates well, the vision and design language of the companies lead designer for many years, Dieter Rams.
While writing a great design blog on Braun and Dieter Rams it is difficult not the mention his ten principles for what he thinks makes great design:
- Good design is innovative
- Good design makes a product useful
- Good design is aesthetic
- Good design makes a product understandable
- Good design is unobtrusive
- Good design is honest
- Good design is long-lasting
- Good design is thorough down to the last detail
- Good design is environmentally-friendly
- Good design is as little design as possible
When looking at these clocks you can see this in action. The end product being a functional and innovative product that is easy to use. One that stands the test of time most importantly. You can ask yourself does this clock fit with any one of these principles and I would say the answer is a yes.
With the addition of electrical components and displays instead of mechanical components the clocks underwent a drastic redesign with the Functional in 1975. The advancement in technology allowing the form to take a more slimline shape almost blending into the surface it sits on. The DN 40, goes back on this returning to the big and bulky designs with clear easy to read numbers. I do feel like these clock designs have nothing on the previous mechanical versions. With the addition of electrical components, I feel like they lost the charm of the originals and become less functional with thin numbers that are more difficult to read.
The DW 20 and 30, released in 1977 and 1978, saw this digital design make its way into their first wristwatch. The technology limitations of cramming this into a watch sized form factor leads to quite a bulky design with very small displays. Similarly to the digital alarm clocks, I feel like these do not give the same pleasure that most Braun products do. The trade-off for new technology results in a less functional watch. While impressive and good technological design, I feel it fails from an aesthetic point of view.
This was then innovated further with the ABK 20, revolutionised with modern manufacturing methods of the time by creating a single injection moulded part, bringing further simplicity to the design. This is opposed to the 8 parts that made up its predecessor. In the late 80s the company also experimented with further minimalist designs. This ABW 35 clock stood out to me as it clearly took principle 5, great design is unobtrusive, very literally. With the removal of all hour and minute markings besides the essentials this design took a step away from the previous clocks seen from the company. The aspect I found the most interesting was the removal of the clock face itself, with the numbers printed onto a clear plastic face, exposing the surface it is mounted on. A clock truly designed to be unobtrusive and blend into the surroundings. While an interesting concept I think it stands out against the other clocks I’ve discussed. While focusing on one principle, it has neglected another by making the product inherently less understandable. I feel there is a point where minimalism goes too far when it comes to clocks. While numbers are not essential I feel the minute markings at least every 5 minutes absolutely are, how can a clock be well designed if it fails to provide you with this basic information.
It’s clear that even when his involvement in these designs reduced, fellow designers like Deitrich Lubs still followed Dieter Rams philosophy. There must be a reason Braun clocks haven’t evolved much since he departed the company, why would they need to...
Current Range